bbl164 发表于 2010-3-23 02:36:32

NOD32五种更新方式的对比——速度

未更新病毒库版本:4109(20090527)
最新病毒库版本:4963(20100321)
更新文件总大小:27.8M

##########nod32自带服务器##########
版本4.0

第一次测试
开始时间:16:43:30
结束时间:16:52:42
用时:9分12秒

Ping statistics for 172.16.0.130:
    Packets: Sent = 569, Received = 569, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 280ms, Average = 4ms

第二次测试
开始时间:16:59:10
结束时间:17:08:48
用时:9分38秒

Ping statistics for 172.16.0.130:
    Packets: Sent = 563, Received = 563, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 1431ms, Average = 17ms

第三次测试
开始时间:17:15:20
结束时间:17:26:46
用时:11分26秒

Ping statistics for 172.16.0.130:
    Packets: Sent = 562, Received = 562, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 851ms, Average = 6ms

平均更新时间:10分钟

##########iis更新服务器##########

第一次测试
开始时间:01:28:46
结束时间:01:31:15
用时:2分29秒

Ping statistics for 172.16.0.134:
    Packets: Sent = 157, Received = 157, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 769ms, Average = 29ms

第二次测试
开始时间:01:38:50
结束时间:01:40:33
用时:1分43秒

Ping statistics for 172.16.0.134:
    Packets: Sent = 124, Received = 124, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 1117ms, Average = 47ms

第三次测试
开始时间:01:48:03
结束时间:01:49:36
用时:1分33秒

Ping statistics for 172.16.0.134:
    Packets: Sent = 103, Received = 103, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 139ms, Average = 7ms

平均更新时间:2分钟

##########apache更新服务器##########

版本apache_2.2.4-win32-x86-no_ssl.msi

第一次测试
开始时间:02:08:33
结束时间:02:10:49
用时:2分16秒

Ping statistics for 172.16.0.134:
    Packets: Sent = 143, Received = 143, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 1595ms, Average = 105ms

第二次测试
开始时间:02:13:36
结束时间:02:15:07
用时:1分31秒

Ping statistics for 172.16.0.134:
    Packets: Sent = 96, Received = 96, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 236ms, Average = 9ms

第三次测试
开始时间:02:16:27
结束时间:02:18:50
用时:2分23秒

Ping statistics for 172.16.0.134:
    Packets: Sent = 91, Received = 91, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 179ms, Average = 11ms

平时更新时间:2.1分钟

##########nginx更新服务器##########
版本nginx-0.7.65

worker_processes1;

events {
    worker_connections1024;
}


http {
    include       mime.types;
    default_typeapplication/octet-stream;

    sendfile      on;
    keepalive_timeout65;

    server {
      listen       2221;
      server_namelocalhost;
      location / {
            root   nod32_update;
            indexindex.html index.htm;
      }
      error_page   500 502 503 504/50x.html;
      location = /50x.html {
            root   html;
      }
   }

}


第一次测试
开始时间:00:41:00
结束时间:00:42:33
用时:1分33秒

Ping statistics for 172.16.0.130:
    Packets: Sent = 179, Received = 179, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 395ms, Average = 12ms

第二次测试
开始时间:00:49:13
结束时间:00:51:02
用时:1分49秒

Ping statistics for 172.16.0.130:
    Packets: Sent = 119, Received = 119, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 1882ms, Average = 44ms

第三次测试
开始时间:00:57:49
结束时间:00:59:13
用时:1分24秒

Ping statistics for 172.16.0.130:
    Packets: Sent = 101, Received = 101, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 540ms, Average = 18ms

平均更新时间:1.59分钟

##########cherokee更新服务器##########
版本Cherokee-setup-0.5.4

Port 2221
DocumentRoot "C:\Program Files\Cherokee\nod32_update\"

DirectoryIndex index.html

Directory / {
   Handler common
}
Directory /images {
   Handler file
}
Extension php {
   Handler phpcgi {
   Interpreter C:\PHP\php-cgi.exe
   }
}

第一次测试
开始时间:23:47:47
结束时间:23:50:50
用时:3分3秒

Ping statistics for 172.16.0.130:
    Packets: Sent = 258, Received = 258, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 843ms, Average = 20ms

第二次测试
开始时间:00:06:30
结束时间:00:09:09
用时:2分39秒

Ping statistics for 172.16.0.130:
    Packets: Sent = 236, Received = 236, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 689ms, Average = 50ms

第三次测试
开始时间:00:18:26
结束时间:00:19:43
用时:1分17秒

Ping statistics for 172.16.0.130:
    Packets: Sent = 85, Received = 85, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 471ms, Average = 32ms

平均更新时间:2.32分钟

上面的测试结果明显地表现出各平台更新速度之间的差距,虽然影响更新速度的因素包括网速和本机速度(测试中的所有时间数据包括从服务器下载病毒库包的时间以及进行更新病毒库的时间)。但相对而言,也显示出了大概的差别。
同时,为了验证更新过程中各平台对网络的影响,我在更新的过程中采用长PING服务器的方式,查看延时。发现用NOD32自带的更新服务器,
虽然速度很慢,但平均延迟较其他的还是比较低的。

network 发表于 2010-3-23 06:24:46

那就把NGINX作为博威NOD企业级用户的御用升级服务器平台

tianzhenbo 发表于 2010-3-23 08:20:45

:loveliness:
页: [1]
查看完整版本: NOD32五种更新方式的对比——速度